We've been promising a review of Frontier's new "made in the USA" lump charcoal and it's time to keep the promise. We had heard that Frontier was selling a new USA version of their lump charcoal which was exciting because this comes to us from PackServ, the same folks that brought us the highly-rated Picnic charcoal. Of course, Frontier's original charcoal was supposed to have been a rebranding of their Picnic brand, but it turned out to be quite a disappointment. But how will their USA version do? Here we go!
First of all, how do you tell this charcoal from their previous non-USA version? The earlier version had a small "Made in Argentina" label on the side of the bag next to the UPC code, as you can see in the photo to the right. The new charcoal has a "Made in USA" label on the bottom of the back of the bag, again next to the UPC code. Also, as far as we are aware, the old Frontier is sold in 10-pound bags, while the new charcoal is sold in a 20-pound "restaurant size" bag, as well as a 10-pound bag. You can see both bag styles on the Frontier web site.
As with all reviews, we start by dumping the bag out onto a plastic sheet for observation and sorting. As you can see from the following table, the news is mostly good regarding the size distribution:
Large |
1.8 pounds |
8.3% |
Medium |
7.8 pounds |
36.2% |
Small |
11.1 pounds |
51.6% |
Chips/Dust |
0.8 pounds |
3.9% |
|
|
|
Total |
21.5 pounds |
|
|
The amount of chips and dust is a very low 3.9%. The only real criticism we have of this charcoal, as you will see as the review progresses, is that there could be less of the small size pieces and more of the large. At least, the size of the majority of the small pieces was close to a golf ball. In pawing through all the pieces in the bag, we came across two small rocks, and about 9 ounces of uncarbonized bark. Personally, we'd discard any of those pieces if we saw them go into the cooker, but then, they were distributed throughout the bag and so you probably wouldn't notice them. (Note that we did not include the 9 ounces of bark in the table above. If you do, you find that your 20-pound bag of charcoal actually contained over 22 pounds. And if you remove the bark and the chips/dust from the bag, you find that your 20-pound bag of charcoal still contains 20.7 pounds of usable charcoal. Fairly impressive.)
Results were average in our chimney starter test. It took four sheets of newspaper to get the charcoal going which is indeed average. While burning in the chimney starter, the charcoal crackled a fair amount but there was no popping. The smoke smelled like your typical American hardwood charcoal, and was relatively mild.
In the maximum temperature test, the charcoal burned just over 1000 degrees which is very high compared to other charcoals. Again there was moderate sparking/crackling and no popping. The fire spread relatively quickly when we added more charcoal to the initial burning charcoal. When we used a MAPP torch to light the charcoal there was a moderate amount of sparking and popping, so be careful if you use any kind of torch to light this and other brands of lump charcoal.
In our burn time test, Frontier's US charcoal burned almost as long as any charcoal we've ever tested. In fact it came in fourth on the all time list. And finally the charcoal produced a very low amount of ash per hour when compared to other charcoals we have tested.
What rating does it get? Well, the charcoal pretty much rocks with its long burn time, low ash, and very reasonable price, but we can't get over the size distribution thing. It really needs fewer small pieces and more large pieces. We've seen a couple of comments posted on the internet agreeing with this sentiment, so it seems that our bag was fairly representative. Nonetheless, Packaging Service Co. has produced another winner. It gets our Recommended rating, just missing being highly recommended.