A few things we'll point out about using the SMOBOT controller:
then you have accidentally brought it up into a semi-secret setup mode. Simply turn the controller off and on and things should return to normal. You do not want to change the values displayed.
Startup Speed: SMOBOT vs. Blowers Intuition would seem to tell us that a blower-based controller should be able to bring a cooker up to temperature faster than the SMOBOT which utilizes the natural draft of your cooker. Once again, it seems that intuition is not always right. Granted, it's hard to conduct a perfect race between two controllers. Things like the starting size of your fire, the amount of charcoal in the cooker and the way the charcoal is stacked (i.e. how much airflow you have) will affect the results. However, we did our best to test bringing a cold cooker up to 350°F using both the SMOBOT and a blower-based controller. As you can see, they both got our cooker up to 300°F in almost the same time. While going from cold to 300°F the SMOBOT had the damper open 100% and the blower-based controller had the blower going 100%. At that point, however, they both started fiddling and trying to slow the rise in temperature. Any difference from this point on is not based on blower versus natural draft, but rather by the algorithm that the controller uses to control the temperature. The blower-based controller was less agressive, got to 350°F first, but also overshot the target and stayed above the target for some length of time. The SMOBOT was more agressive in slowing the ascent of the temperature, so it took longer to actually get to 350°F but it stabilized near the target temperature long before the blower-based controller did. As far as we're concerned, we wouldn't buy one or the other based on how long it takes to get to a certain temperature, but certainly the SMOBOT can keep up with a blower-based controller. Charcoal Consumption: Smobot vs. Blowers When discussing temperature controllers, the topic of charcoal consumption often comes up. Some think that blower-based temperature controllers consume more charcoal than cooking with the natural draft. Some think the opposite. We ran some tests to determine what actually happens. We burned precisely the same weight of charcoal at 350°F using the SMOBOT controller and then using a blower-based controller. We measured the time that each controller was able to keep the cooker above 300°F. The results were pretty clear. Burning charcoal with the SMOBOT's natural draft can result in longer burns of up to 32% longer than with a blower-based controller.
Open Lid Detect (OLD) is the function the detects the lid of your cooker opening, then behaving differently than normal so as to manage the cooker's temperature and prevent a big temperature spike when your cooker recovers after closing the lid. This feature is found on most temperature controllers, so how did the SMOBOT do? Here's what happened when we opened the lid of our cooker, with OLD turned off and with OLD turned on. In each case, the cooker was stable at 250°F, the lid was opened for 60 seconds, and then the lid was closed:
So, with no OLD function, when the cooker recovered, it overshot the target temprature by 42°F and took 29 minutes to stabilize. With the OLD function turned on, the cooker overshot by 10°F and took only 15 minutes to stabilize. Needless to say, Open Lid Detect is a feature worth turning on. But now we come down to the meat and potatoes. How well does the SMOBOT actually control the temperature of your cooker? Here are the results that we obtained when allowing the SMOBOT to control a large Big Green Egg at low, medium and high temperatures:
As you can see, the SMOBOT results are pretty impressive and far beyond what is adequate for cooking barbecue. The SMOBOT is the first electronic temperature controller to control the natural draft of your cooker instead of relying on a blower to pump air into the cooker. If you think this is important, you will also find that the SMOBOT controller is extremely good at controlling the temperature of your cooker with some of the best results we've seen in all of our testing. It's WiFi/cloud features make monitoring and controlling your cooker from a laptop, desktop, tablet or smart phone insanely easy, with both web page and Application access to your controller. In the way of features, it has all the basics, although a beeper on the controller for alarms and some sort of Ramp/Keep Warm feature would be a welcome addition. The low power consumption that results from the elimination of a blower makes it possible to power the SMOBOT with a small rechargeable battery pack, which in turn means you can put all of your sensitive electronics in a watertight enclosure for when it rains. And finally, the lower charcoal consumption that comes from controlling airflow with the vents instead of a blower is also a welcome surprise. So if you are contemplating the purchase of an electronic temperature controller for your cooker, SMOBOT should definitely be on your list for consideration. SMOBOT controllers are available from the SMOBOT web site. You can also purchase them from Amazon. If you use the following links, we get a small percentage of any sales.
Web: www.smobot.com |
You can support this website by shopping at The Naked Whiz Website Store and Amazon.com
|